Please note: Due to a major revision in The News Tribune's publishing system, article commenting switched from community.thenewstribune.com to the Pluck platform on Wednesday, January 14, 2009. Contact the Community Manager for more information.
Which Washington confection should be named the official state candy?
Submitted by papasan on December 31, 2008 - 6:53pm.
Almond Roca looks like deer droppings. Applets/Cotlets have the consistency and look like ear wax. Anything edible should LOOK appealing and edible. I would not eat either one. Why do we need a State candy anyway? This State has terrible health care and worse dental care for it's citizens. The last thing that we need is a State sponsored detriment to poor health. Why not a State cigarette?
Submitted by mcgyver on December 31, 2008 - 11:51pm.
So I take it you don't eat Oysters or Clams because they don't look appealing? How about Shrimp, Cod or Crab? Looks and taste seldom go hand in hand. Where do you get this stat about Washington having worse dental care than any other state? I'm guessing it came from the same place as your thoughts on Almond Roca.
Submitted by Dcr628 on December 31, 2008 - 10:22am.
You think that's hilarious!
I'm thinking with all this nasty candy screwing up the digestive tract and all this poopy stuff about Mountain Bars and Baby Ruths that a far more accurate image should be little tiny chocolate chips in a nice little pile!
Submitted by Dcr628 on December 31, 2008 - 9:32am.
Well it wont be EITHER. Aplets and Cotlets come from THOSE people over there in 'western Idaho" and Almond Roca is a T..Ta....(cough cough) Tac..(hack hack)..Taco....m Tacoma candy! Since the great deciding czars in SEATTLE are not represented NEITHER of them will win!
Personally I like the idea of the Mountain bar! And NOW Ive got a dang CRAVING!!
and that naughty comment about Baby Ruth is just plain POOPY!!! BwaHaaaaaa!
Submitted by danlbuckley on December 30, 2008 - 4:51pm.
I think the companies should compete financially for the naming rights. Like Qwest and Safeco did for the stadiums. Proceeds to go into the general fund to help our deficit.
Submitted by desilu73 on December 30, 2008 - 2:01pm.
If the aplets and cotlets movement is defeated, the divide between eastern and western halves of the state will deepen. The talk of splitting the state will intensify. Dark dark days will follow.
Submitted by sharonjo on December 30, 2008 - 2:15pm.
Some people can manage to have two thoughts at the same time. For instance, our state economy is in bad shape AND we have tasty state products which are marketed successfully elsewhere.
Submitted by slugoxyz on December 30, 2008 - 2:45pm.
I wish I was just like you. Stuffing your face, crumbs on your extended belly and cushioned by more butt that four people. All that and a second thought too? I sure wish I could think and eat at the same time just like you.
Submitted by desilu73 on December 30, 2008 - 2:54pm.
You are underestimating your abilities. I am sure you can multi-task. I bet you scratch your balls and have thoughts all the time. Don't be so hard on yourself.
Submitted by aislander on December 30, 2008 - 11:34am.
We can adopt him. And, we ARE running the state budget on his model, right? Finally, I have heard his theme song is "My Boy Lollipop," a confection, no?
Submitted by playniceplease on December 30, 2008 - 2:34pm.
Judging from this and some of your past comments, you seem to be awfully interested in the gay Mr. Barney Frank. You sure there isn't something stirring way down deep inside? Does he represent "boy candy" to you?
Submitted by aislander on December 31, 2008 - 9:43am.
There is another poster who revels in skewering (no sexual connotation implied) Bawney and his speech...er...impediment. And I can't imagine ANYONE, gay or straight, would view this slimeball as "boy candy..."
Submitted by DAKOTANATIVE on December 30, 2008 - 11:07am.
Why do we need an official candy? Why do we need an official fruit, veggie, flower or fish? Why do we waste money debating this crap. Use that time and money to create meaninful legistation.
Submitted by fibergirl on December 30, 2008 - 11:04am.
As a transplant to this fair state, I can only say that Almond Roca represents Washington state to the world much more than Aplets and Cotlets. I have fond memories of my father sharing his Christmas stash with us kids every year. Applets & Cotlets were the nasty Turkish delite that my grandma ate.
Submitted by sharonjo on December 30, 2008 - 2:11pm.
As a native of eastern Washington, I voted for Aplets & Cotlets because I think the apples were here before the chocolate. My grandad planted trees about 1912. Personally I love both candies. I think the Aplets appeal to older nibblers. I agree with the great marketing job which Almond Roca does.
poll question.